Modern and Postmodern Ideas Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Modern and Postmodern Ideas - Essay Example The essay "Modern and Postmodern Ideas" investigates the artists of the modern and postmodern era. Modern and postmodern artists have worked to depict the range of human emotions. There are a lot of artists such as Picasso that focuses on the emotions themselves. Picasso’s works, characteristic of the modern abstractionists, focused on presenting graphic images of emotions without relying on true representations of objects. In his paintings â€Å"Figures on Beach†, â€Å"Weeping Woman† and â€Å"Girl Before a Mirror†, Picasso presents each figure as an abstract collection of geometrical shapes arranged in such a way as to denote the specific emotions and feelings his figures are experiencing. His use of color goes a long way toward conveying the emotions he wished to express just as the relative hardness or softness of his lines worked to establish the relative sharp or dull nature of the feelings. Another aspect of his art that infuses all three of these paintings is the concept of portraying motion or action through the representation of more than one viewpoint at a time. In â€Å"Figures on Beach†, this concept of movement is shown in the various placements of the eyes and nostrils of the figures and the seemingly random placement of the woman’s breasts. The confusion of straight body parts that allows arms and legs to almost become interchangeable also reflects the idea that these people are not remaining in stationary positions but are instead allowing their arms and legs to become tangled as part of their embrace.

Process Analysis Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Process Analysis - Research Paper Example Process thinking alerts managers to the pathway to be used in decision making. The inappropriate pathway may cause losses due to lack of understanding processing and informational biases. It helps to optimize the whole organization as it is seen as an entire rather than departments. For instance, the expedient pathway, which relies on, the manager’s level expertise without the benefit of information while the global perspective pathway assumes that available information influences an individual’s perception (Rodgers, 2006). Managers use process thinking as an aid in strategic thinking and organizational design resulting in flexibility in response to both internal and external changes. Ability to adapt to changes gives an organization a competitive edge against its competitors (Goetsch & Davis, 2009). For example, changes that happen outside the organization will require management to rely on a path that focuses more information not to be caught off guard. It is an accep table method to empower employees as well as hone their creative skills in decision making. As the organization embraces process thinking, it allows employees to take the initiative in the interest of the organization’s objectives (Goetsch & Davis, 2009). ... This implies that incase of problems, blame is directed at the process rather than the person. Process thinking, therefore, focuses on optimizing systems and fostering cooperative problem solving and decision making. For instance, it allows managers to examine the fitness of a pathway to organizations needs when a problem occurs as a result of following a laid down process (Goetsch & Davis, 2009). It allows sifting through information for relevance and where to begin because people are bombarded with information from different media coupled with limited processing ability. Quality Management Tools Quality management tools are used to improve activities as well as the decision making process and these tools can be used at all stages of production (Goetsch & Davis, 2009). Two of the tools that facilitate proper decision making are the Pareto chart and Cause and effect diagram. This is because they are clear visual representation of problems and their causes. The Pareto chart is used to focus on analysis process and solution finding. It positions problems and their causes in reference to their frequency and occurrences. It points out opportunities and their priorities for improvement and shows where to concentrate efforts and the biggest causes to the problem. It creates a common view, as success in quality management depends on sharing common views of problems and actions to be taken. Another advantage is that it used in comparison of the before and after situations after improvement action. Therefore, it is an effective tool in determining progress and effectiveness of action taken (Goetsch & Davis, 2009). For example it will show the president the necessary information without dwelling on the non issues saving time and resources